this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
231 points (96.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

42539 readers
904 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just felt like showing some appreciation. Thank's y'all

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would, but even more, id prefer that you stay on topic instead of just resorting to ad hominem. if they say something untrue, show them to be lying.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't really ad hominem when it's not an argument in the first place. I'm insulting tankies

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's not a logical argument, no. it is a rhetorical argument, though. and it's bad faith.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh for sure it's in bad faith, it pisses me off to see stuff like people defending China genociding tibetans

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so call that out when it happens, but I've never seen that.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Good you haven't! Everyone is better off not reading the discussions were they spout stuff like defending gulags since those "only killed few million people". I do try to call them out when I see it, but these days I just mostly insult them when I can, so I can block whoever gets triggered and reveals themselves. I owe them nothing and they won't get anything fruitful out of me since I'm not engaging in a way that allows them to spout even more propaganda, so it's win-win for all. Also I get to insult tankies