this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
117 points (96.1% liked)
Technology
85420 readers
3375 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I fucking love it when the exact people who make it their life's mission not to pay their employees living wages so that they can hoard wealth like an evil dragon come out and tell us that the new tech they are using to replace us will make us rich. Really fucking Jeff? How about we eat you and take it? That's the only way I see it happening.
No, he said two-earner households, will become one-earner households, he didn't mention* anyone will become rich**, just that one person from the household will become unemployed.
(* at least he didn't mention it in the cited fragment. I didn't read the entire thing, my time is too precious, I must waste it on writing comments instead of reading sources.) (** Of course he will become richer, but that's the obvious part of the idea and doesn't need to be mentioned)
upvote for honesty :)
How exactly will two earner households become one earner households without one of the earners making double the money?
Lol... By the magic of being poor
By becoming even poorer.
The theory here is that if everyone is twice as productive, everything costs half as much in relation to what people earn.
Of course that doesn't work unless there's heavy competition in the market for everything.
Yes that doesn't happen when monopolies dominate the economy as they do in the USA. Then the monopolies just take higher margins.
I've heard many a time from many a booster that AI will lead to UBI. This reminds me of that. CEOs selling delusion in a desperate attempt to distract from the reality, always claiming better lives are just around the next corner.
Yeah we will get a UBI but they won't pay taxes to fund it and will take jobs from the taxpayers who do pay. Same story as trickle down economics and we all know how that ended.
The argument is always that “they’ll have to”. And really, it’s like “Bitch, they don’t care if you live or die. “
actually i disagree with this. money flow should look something like this:
the community (town, city) donates money to the people (UBI), they spend it to buy goods and services from companies (which make a profit that way), which then have to pay taxes to the community.
it's not companies' job to provide for people. that's politics' job.
Sure, that's how it should work. But how it actually works is that Amazon pays an effective tax rate of 1.4%. Tesla pays an effective tax rate of 0%. Yes they pay no tax. Meta pays 3.6%.
The billionaires themselves pay lower tax rates than their secretaries and janitors. Both Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos have had years where they paid no tax. Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg are paying effective tax rates around 13%.
So, yes I'd like to live in this fantasy world too. But the government can't raise enough taxes for a UBI by taking in only a fraction of the money that they themselves give out.
Companies should exist to serve the community, not so a few assholes can get filthy rich.