this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)
World News
3359 readers
94 users here now
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It actually is a virtually impossible challenge, even if not literally impossible. Basically the logistics we're talking about is:
For it to fulfill "take": children can't ever use a camera
For it to fulfill "share": children can't share any images or videos digitally, including via text to people they know
For it to fulfill "view": children can't view any images or videos on a digital device
And as if by magic, the sexual predators will cease to exist. Including the abusers who know the children, which from everything I've ever heard over the years, is the more common source of child abuse.
This is 100% (claiming to) treat the symptoms without addressing the root of the problem at all.
Yeah because that's an absurd request for technology. Even with privacy issues aside, it's just ridiculous to expect an automated system to block human nudity specifically. Not even getting into the fact that there are legitimate cases where nudity is just nudity, not sexual or sexual exploitation.
Reminds me of the push in the US for banning abortion. "We gotta protect the children," but the logistics of the ban itself, the consequences of enforcing such a thing, are brushed aside. These pants on fire lying servants of empire and capital are afraid that empire and capitalism in decay is going to lead to revolt and they'd rather put more and more money and resources into surveillance and policing than do even mild reforms.