this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)
pathfinder
495 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Traditional, the least senior member of the team has the least experience and lowest skillset.
In reality that is not always the case though. I've had senior colleagues close to retirement age that did fuck-all, mostly resisted new ideas just because they liked it the old way, and were just waiting and wasting resources. If you keep these people and fire less senior (not necessarily junior/entry-level) people that were actually contributing, because of tradition, you're terrible at running your business.
Well, when you're CEO at Paizo, you can fire all the folks you think are slacking.
I'm not sure you read the article though, or know why the company's finances have gone sour
No I read it, and understand the predicament is caused by another company going bankrupt tying part of paizos stock in their warehouse. I still firmly believe firing less senior staff just because of tradition or some misguided honor code or whatever the hell it is, is complete bullshit.
This would have been previously agreed upon by the union contract, and they also said explicitly that the union would have a period of 20 days between selecting the business units where layoffs will happen and the actual layoffs to negotiate or provide alternatives. Paizo is a pro-union shop generally, and they're telling the union that layoffs are necessary and giving them a chance to make suggestions, while also following the terms of the union contract. Nothing shady about that.
You are describing someone who should have been fired for those reasons alone. If they weren't in Paizo's situation then thats not the situation here..just sayin