this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
574 points (98.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

9317 readers
332 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 49 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Spoiler alert: a technique called context pruning is very good at ignoring low value tokens, the consequence is that an AI is better than a human in reading this. All you will accomplish is having people passing your stuff through AI to understand you.

Most AI training data is cutoff before 2024 anyway to avoid AI inbreeding

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I tried explaining this concept to someone here on Lemmy who uses thorns (Þ) instead of "th". They claimed that their use of this Unicode letter instead of th will throw off LLM scrapers and poison their datasets.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

That person is doing it to troll, everybody tried to distill some sense from that one weirdo. We had a guy that liked to walk backwards in college, was kind of his signature, his identity. Eventually they grow up, as long as nobody is hurt to each their own

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This seems quite accurate. Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them: they feel they're close to the point where AI can create better models by itself, and the possibility of it going "rogue".

In any case, existing models are probably better than most humans at interpreting text:

As an AI analyzing this... it's a fantastic piece of satire! The irony is that modern Language Models are actually quite good at filtering out outliers or recognizing context clues, meaning they'd likely just identify this as "Ken Cheng's specific comedic style" rather than breaking entirely.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them

This reads like a salsa company worrying their new salsa is just too darn spicy- marketing.

[–] Brummbaer@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago

I wish they stopped this marketing bullshit. Oh no our AI is too good it's scaring us. This is the equivalent of carpet stores doing out of business sales.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Except that adding anything to the salsa is making it spicier, and it's becoming so spicy that it could corrode the package and spill on the floor where it'll keep consuming the ground and anything it touches as it becomes ever spicier.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and the possibility of it going "rogue".

🤷‍♂️

[–] mech@feddit.org -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wish it were that easy.
Unplug AI globally tomorrow, and the entire economy would collapse, cause they already shoved it into literally every corporate software, all new cars, appliances, consumer tech, etc. Front- and backend.

And those systems weren't designed to fail gracefully.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

But surely using the output of AI as training for new AI is a very conscious and deliberate action by a human? And should be cancelable? 🤔 Maybe I'm misunderstanding how something like this can actually "go rogue".

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Shhh! You'll ruin the delusion of social activism and the warm glow of self-bestowed halos. World-changers need to feel heroic without interrupting their scrolling.

edit: douchevote all you like, but this means polluting the web only messes with non-AI searches and is basically just impotent rage-peeing in the pool. But critical thinking about anything that looks anti-AI isn't allowed on social media is it, because... well, it just isn't.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I agree with you, doomscroll activists need their snakeoils