this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
446 points (97.9% liked)

Privacy

5853 readers
103 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is why I'm happy about Motorola next year

With some luck I'll have time to put together my diy palmtop-esque machine, but we'll see if that works out.

[–] Yakfolk@anarchist.nexus 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I really hope the Motorola thing actually pans out. Based on the general state of things I’m done with both Apple and Google.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are going to start loading GrapheneOS on phones from the start

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Fantastic! Thanks for explaining 🙏

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I got a reply clarifying that theyre partnering with graphene. I figured I'd reply so you didn't miss it in the thread

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah same, I have no idea what's happening with Motorola...

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are partnering with GrapheneOS

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

I don't trust Motorola to make a phone that doesn't have numerous hardware backdoors. Motorola does a ton of work for both the US and Israel. If it sounds too good to be true than it probably is. I think the US/Israel gave Motorola a bit of cash to make backdoored hardware that's made specifically for a privacy hardened software.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 month ago

Same here. And its not like we are overwhelmed with alternatives, too.

Things have taken quite the turn from the nexus era to now, dropping nexus for pixel felt so blatant too.

[–] TheOtherwise@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is the Motorola thinf being referred to here?

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The GrapheneOS folks are working with Motorola to have Graphene pre-installed on one of their phones. It would be the first time it is officially usable on anything but a Pixel. It won't solve the problem described in the OP though. It's still Android.

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Afaik GrapheneOS won't be affected, neither will e/OS. The real problem with them still being based as AOSP is, that google might stop the AOSP project. That would mean the forks would need to do that continous based development themselves.

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It affects Graphene because people using it still get their apps from Google Play, Aurora Store (also the Play Store), and F-Droid, etc.

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

For anyone who hasn't heard, Motorola is partnering with GrapheneOS to release compatible phones in 2027.