this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
647 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85163 readers
3609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I used to be able to browse the web happily with JS disabled. It started to get worse about 10 years ago and really bad about 6 years ago and EXTREMELY bad over the past year or two.

And I get it, it’s because of all the scrapers constantly fucking everything up and needing to be blocked. But still. The internet is unusable. All so the likes of Gemini or Claude or Deepseek can generate unlimited amounts of spam and slop.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 2 points 22 hours ago

Say thank you to React for popularizing rethinking everything webdev for the sake of why the fuck not.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's not because of the scrapers though. It's probably because JavaScript is needed to make the page interactive in most cases. Almost everything is a single page web app now you can't do that without JavaScript.

People could make old style sites where there is a full page reload every time you click a link but they aren't as nice.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

They arent as nice? You and I have very different tastes

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I went to a Microsoft site to fill out a form to register for a 2 two conference. My CPU shot up to 100 percent. The task manager (in the browser) told me that this was using a huge amount of computer for a ton of javascript running on a page that didn't need any at all.

It is very abused for analytics, little is used to make a page "nice" anymore.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Just because people use JavaScript for bad things doesn't mean it's not also necessary for the other things though

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's also because of the scrapers.

Without javascript, you can't realistically do the "prove you are human bits", which I seem to have to do many times a day this year.

Anubis did implement a 'No-JS' challenge, but it's super trivial for scrapers to overcome. They just have to parse the refresh tag and retry after the specified interval. Not even 'proof of work', but increasingly the proof of work isn't considered sufficient and many sites are back to the captcha family of bullshit.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I tried no script for a few days but it was so frustrating that the majority of websites just flat out didn't work I had to get rid of it.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just have to go into no script and approve the parts that make the website function but not the ad stuff. Its a pain when you first land on a site but the browser remembers what you have allowed. So overtime you get back to normal working sites, minus ads and tracking stuff

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Until you distro hop and realize that the noscript plugin migrates with your firefox profile, but not the website settings you've set up.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't those stored in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/profile.default/.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

That would have been helpful yesterday, but thank you none the less. I'd already wiped the drive and swapped to cachyos when I realized I had to redo noscript.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ouch, you are painfully correct.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, fortunately memory serves fairly well as to which sites are necessary across multiple webpages, and which ones can be universally blocked.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

you can set permanent rules. Its very much active protection as in you have to actively fiddle with it when going to new sites, which also makes you more aware how much stuff they are running. So many sites load like 20 different things but need only 1 or 2 to function flawlessly.

Imo, it would be scary to browse without noscript, even with ublock on. For me its kind of like first line of defence, with ublock I can pretty safely test out what is needed for website to work and what isnt without worrying too much. Everything being blocked by default makes it more safe and if some website turns out to be really bad, i can set it as untrusted so i remember it later too if it appears again or if i go there again because i forgot.

And if I get really annoyed with fiddling with some website i want to work and which doesnt seem that threatening, i just set it temporarily all allowed.