this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

7471 readers
40 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Back to the (stone) DDR4 age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So what do we do with all the PCs that only support DDR5? Throw them away and get DDR4 ones?

Don’t get me wrong this is great news but wouldn’t it make more sense to allocate this production to more DDR5 instead as that is the future?

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

I think there still more active computers with ddr4 than with ddr5, most people dont havr the shiny thing

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet the fact that people are clinging to DDR4-era stuff is partly to blame.

Like me: I have a bunch of ddr4 stuff because I buy on the Second market. I am part of the problem.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Last year I built a ddr4 machine. It was easier to source, a bit cheaper, and DDR5 solved zero problems for me.

People like me saw this coming a mile away and did the same damn thing which is why this is happening.