this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
47 points (98.0% liked)
The Deprogram
1950 readers
102 users here now
"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985
International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.
Rules:
- No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
- No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
- No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
- Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.
Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is the most roundabout way for the government to have a say in AI company shareholder decisions. Bernie could instead advocate for Chinese-style golden shares which give the government the ability to veto key corporate decisions while not threatening the existing profit and share distribution.
I think the Chinese model of layered state ownership is the best applicable model for the US to build from. Having every Wal-Mart for example, owned by the national federal government, would be less impactful on working people then if every local community, city, county, and state, held sway over relavent fields of interest which collectively builds up to a majority share. Not to mention the workers of the enterprise and local minority groups in the area effected by a store's decisions.
I don't know that he's aware of this model.