this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
16 points (75.0% liked)

Programming

27099 readers
233 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

It works pretty well for greenfield, that’s where I’ve been using it. A pretty involved monorepo with a decent bit of code and things are still going reasonably well.

Also, leaning on documents as deliverable artifacts for people and for AI awareness / consumption helps me.

Like put together an architecture document for either the entire application or specific parts and subsystems (or multiple documents with different granularity) those can list future considerations.

I pretty often will include those documents when generating proposals / specs to make sure the AI is building in the right direction. It’s not perfect, there are some rough edges and these are the early days of this whole process.