this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
547 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84996 readers
2878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Regretful cities aren't sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

Why aren't they just... Removing them?

Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You don't have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

You'd be surprised how few worries I have when I'm brandishing an angle grinder

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

on a totally unrelated topic, but harbor freight is a great place to get affordable tools.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

And if you time your visit right, free bucket!

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

If you had read the article you'd know that the cities aren't sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they're covering them while working that out.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why read all article when some article good enough?

What am I? Some kind of readist? A phisosopher?

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

READING FOR NERDS

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

If I remember correctly the agreement is some kind of lease, so the city/county doesn't really own them after they are installed.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard the excuse that they're private property so they can't. They're not hard to remove though. They're usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I'm not so sure about that because even if they are privately owned, that doesn't mean they have the inherent right to be mounted on a city pole. The property isnt harmed by removing them from the pole and storing them in a deep underground bunker infested with Hanta Virus rats, black widows, and alligators.