this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
0 points (50.0% liked)

Debate An Atheist

177 readers
2 users here now

A place for theists to come and debate atheists.

Atheism, for the purposes of this community, is defined as lack of belief in deities (as opposed to belief in a lack of deities or other definitions).

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, I make these posts now n again, now on Lemmy a couple times where I make myself as stupid as I can make myself, clearly stating premises and open many avenues of approach for even a novice writer and thinker to enter into a debate with me. Even on a supposed debate community, I can't get anyone to debate me. Let's make this real simple.

Premise: God is real

Definition of God: an independent phenomenon likened to a unified field of consciousness that emerges from the properties of "emptiness" to then fold in and on itself across eleven dimensions to form a topological matrix that acts as a monadic nodal communication system

Explain like I'm five version: God is a big balloon of consciousness that made itself into a complex balloon animal, and each of us is one of the sections that communicate with each other

Definition of emptiness: the null that can be implicit (nothingness/0) or explicit (fullness/1) that manifests all phenomequalia

Definition of topology: the math behind intersecting dimensional space; knots/entanglements

Definition of monad: the pocket of consciousness you are; you are not a featherless biped, you are a pocket of consciousness (everything you experience is self-contained within your neurons, yea? And you're experiencing the "outside" of you, right? So all that "outside" is actually inside you)

I don't know what else I need to say to start this. Perhaps I'm just removed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] dreamy@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The zero hypothesis is that an objective external reality exists independently of a human mind, you need evidence that would work to overturning that, and telling someone to meditate is not it.

If your "equal energy exchange" hypothesis was true, I would expect a comet hitting Peter Thiel's home yesterday. That's sadly not how the universe works though.

And you can't prove that you're not a brain-in-a-vat either. If you were a brain-in-a-vat, you could just be programmed to think and see exactly the way you do. No theistic worldview can change the fact that absolute truth is unattainable.

Oh, so you don't want to do a science experiment yourself to prove anything. Yea, meditating is just sitting still, that's all it is, bro. Perceiving and undoing the karmic fetters that bind you to the existence-illusion complex, well, those are just words you don't know given how much effort you put into ascertaining truth for yourself.

Prolly doesn't even kno there b escarpments

In the density o connections created creatin

A means to see through personal ignorance

By choosing to make self anew by deviating

From what self was; u r yur only impairment

& thus because 'I' is God, ur life masturbatin

Cuz though puzzle has logics compartment

Eve learns first, through intuitive divinating!

And the picture itself removes impediment

From remaking logic w/ God extrapolating

Where pieces fit where logic cannot invent

The faith to push self far; its reinvigorating