this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
158 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15853 readers
482 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm shocked its only 60% if I'm being honest.

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's advertising: they think they are "free" and really wanted to have a car

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No? Forced means something is unwanted. My interpretation is that there is not enough public transport and they wish there was.

[–] FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

yes?

40% don't feel forced.

'they [the 40%] think they [the 40%] are “free” and really wanted to have a car'

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I would have guessed much higher.

[–] pucker4676@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Carbrain is a bugger. It took much less than a century for people to go from protesting cars to "yes please, can I have another."

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

North America went from having a sprawling ubiquitous continental rail system to saying that rail would never work here because we're a sprawling continent.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And how do we get around the country? Yea I could rent a vehicle every time I want to leave the city. But that wouldn't be preactucle since I live outside of the city.

[–] pucker4676@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As the other person said, rail is the way. Look up China's high speed rail. Why would we want to do 110km/h on beat up roads when we could do 350km/h on smooth rail? Road rage or read a book? I'd much rather read a book.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Could possibly be that their population is almost entirely concentrated in a few cities where there is sufficient public transport infrastructure.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I doubt it. Canadian cities are not known for their transit. Plus in Ontario the premier made building bike lanes illegal.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Canadian transit inefficiency is why the famous urbanist channel NotJustBikes started his work and moved away from there.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Quick look says it's not much different from US urban population numbers, so that must not be it.
And they have the same 60% also.
Meanwhile, roughly 58% of car-owning adults express a strong interest in living car-free or are completely open to ditching their vehicles if viable infrastructure existed.