this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
737 points (95.0% liked)
People Twitter
10000 readers
1743 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not necessarily. A car by itself does not have a big carbon footprint at all, the problem with cars is that basically everyone has one, uses it for everything, and gets a new one every X years.
I drive a small car that I own since 2008, at that point it was already used, and it has 85000 km on it. If everyone of my age and up did that and drove so little, we'd have like 20-100 times less carbon footprint from cars.
It wouldn't even make sense for me to upgrade to an electric car. Yes, it'd use less and greener fuel, but the amount of carbon it'd cost to produce probably wouldn't "break even" until soooo many years in the future, maybe even after I die, at which point it'd even be a bad investment, carbon-wise.
So, like almost anything, it depends.
the problem is over consumption, yeah.
and the social environment in which it's encouraged, and less consumption is punished.
it always shocks me, as a small car drive, how hostile people are towards me for owning a car that just does it's job and has minimal costs and that I kept it for a long time. rather than the obsessive need so many people I meet who are buying a new car every few years and then whining about how much it costs.