this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
90 points (76.2% liked)

Selfhosted

59508 readers
787 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been thinking about this more and more. According to the sidebar, this community is "A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control." Based on that I don't think Plex qualifies.

Privacy: Plex clearly records the metadata of what you watch. When I used it, it would send me a report by email of what my "friends" were watching. Even with that turned off, their services still track telemetry.

Control: Plex has all of it. They can (and do) make unilateral changes to the service, how authentication works, where you can run it, etc.

So I ask, when you are hosting something that is entirely dependent on a commercial entity to function, is Plex really selfhosting in the spirit of this community?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remon@ani.social 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It software hosted on hardware I physically control. That's self-hosting.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm self hosting Microsoft Office right now

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

(I know you're just joking)

☝️🤓, We typically don't consider local-only applications as being hosted.

Hosted implies a server and the ability to operate remotely and to service multiple users.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Controlling the software is an integral part of the ethos of self hosting. Literally right in the first sentence of the wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-hosting_(network)

Self-hosting is the practice of running and maintaining a website or service, as well as own servers for e-mail, IM, NTP and so on, using a private server, instead of using a service outside of the administrator's own control. Self-hosting allows users to have more control over their data, privacy, and computing infrastructure, as well as potentially saving costs and improving skills.

instead of using a service outside of the administrator's own control

Plex is outside of the administrators control.

[–] remon@ani.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plex is outside of the administrators control.

That's funny, because I'm pretty sure I installed it and I also have the power to uninstall it.

Anyway, I have no really interest in arguing with elitist takes that are objectively wrong.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's just about installing a program and bring able to uninstall it, that would mean that if Netflix made a program you could install, you're now self hosting Netflix.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, that depends on what type of software netflix would make available. If it's just a client application, that doesn't really qualify as self-hosting, since it's a client and not a server. That's basically just using an app on any device.

But if you could install the netflix server side software and connect it to your own media library and access it with your own local clients, then you'd be literally self-hosting netflix, indeed.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah, but I control if the client application is installed or not. And technically Netflix did allow downloading content for offline viewing - as long as you had an account (don't know if they still do).

Now both the content and the application are on your hardware. Ergo by your logic, that would be self hosting.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't control the Netflix server, AT ALL. How is this hard to comprehend.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't control Plex's remote authentication servers at all, either, how is this hard to comprehend?

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip -1 points 21 hours ago

That's why nobody is self-hosting Plex's authentication server, they're hosting the Plex Media Server. I think you're getting confused.

[–] remon@ani.social 0 points 1 day ago

I mean .. if you somehow can also download all the content, yeah. You're literally be self hosting netflix. Their content library is probably the more important part to their business model than the software ... What is your point?