349
Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with lawful access bill
(www.theglobeandmail.com)
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
349 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
86010 readers
3405 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe we should be looking at the larger picture here this is exactly why Signal or any other privately owned centralized messaging system can never be trusted. Stop using Signal or WhatsApp.
Look at alternatives like Matrix that are immune to this sort of thing.
The point flew over your head so hard. People already use and can look into matrix and that makes this still bad.
matrix is not immune to this lol
Not trying to be a jerk, I just don't understand. If the government ordered matrix to put a backdoor into the code, couldn't we just install a version that doesn't have the backdoor? It's open source, someone is bound to fork it. So then the government's only option is to hunt down every matrix server in canada that doesn't have a backdoor and persecute the owner, which would be time and cost intensive but I guess possible. So at that point could we not just host the servers outside of Canada? What do they do in that case?
Decentralized solutions certainly are more resilient regarding legal action against hosts. But we do also need to fight the legal battle as much as we can. As long as there are laws restricting things like encryption that everyone needs to use, there can be selective enforcement against politically inconvenient individuals and organizations. It's another tool for suppressing dissent and free expression.
I use Matrix but it (like XMPP) does depend on servers and, though anyone can host one, this can make it vulnerable to law enforcement actions too. Others I've heard recommended include Simplex and Briar, which avoid this need for servers but may be more confusing for non-technical users. There's definitely an issue with decentralized software being more complicated to set up. Signal has been successful because it's so easy to use.