Solarpunk

8961 readers

15 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

ex_06@slrpnk.net

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

294

Solar electricity is poised to overtake coal in—of all places—Texas (www.motherjones.com)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the first time ever, solar is set to generate more electricity than coal in the power market managed by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. Nobody is building new coal power plants in the state, but developers are adding more solar there than anywhere else in the country. As a result of those diverging trajectories, the federal government expects ERCOT will receive 78 billion kilowatt-hours from solar in 2026, and just 60 from coal.

This trend does have seasonal variations. Last year, solar output beat coal on a monthly basis from March through August, and this year it is expected to do so from March through December, per the US Energy Information Administration at the Department of Energy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The amount of systemic change that needs to happen in the political and economic landscape realistically cannot happen in under four years from start to finish. It will require long-term investments in infrastructure projects that take years to build, which means at some point voters are gonna have to be patient and stop flipping sides whenever conditions don’t materially improve overnight.

In other words, we’re fucked…

yeah the US really needs to learn (possibly the hard way) that there needs to be a political plan for the industry. in the 20th century apparently it could do fine without that, but that just doesn't work anymore. you can't have efficient industry without a long-term plan.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yup, I agree wholeheartedly. Major industries, especially ones that provide basic necessities and utilities (and I'm including web access in that, because let's be honest), should all be considered public services anyway and should be provided for with tax dollars and centralized planning accountable to the constituencies.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i'll include:

water, food and healthcare
housing
transport
energy
and IT and education

all at the communal level, responsible to the citizens

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree, but I'd also include heating (whether natural gas or otherwise) and internet access. Maybe even cell service

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is already included, heating as energy (electricity and whatever fuel or gas you use to drive and heat) and internet access as IT (maybe should have called it IT and telecommunication services)

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Good point, just wanted to clarify