this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
210 points (97.7% liked)

Selfhosted

60253 readers
483 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
210
People who are staying on Plex, have you tried Jellyfin? What about it do you not prefer? (real question) (discuss.online)
submitted 1 month ago by kiol@discuss.online to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
438 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Honest question, because I know multiple people who are not looking to jump ship since they already have the Plex Pass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kiol@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Any particular API security issues? Never considered exposing Jellyfin, but can certainly understand how it simplifies access.

[–] Bryan065@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This was the security report from awhile back:

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

Lot's of things have been fixed but theres still much to do. The issue was broken down to smaller issues for tracking and I check back every once in a while.

Even if there were no security issues, exposing jellyfin is also another can... choice of:

  1. open up ports
  2. cloudflare (and potential ban for video content on the free tier, even if caching is disabled)
  3. vps with enough bandwidth
[–] b34k@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don’t you have to open a port for Plex remote access?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You do not but you'll be severely bandwidth limited. It'll go through their servers if a port can't be opened.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh I forgot about that option

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

That sounds like you do have to open one then? Otherwise you are "severely bandwidth limited" and who wants that?

[–] kiol@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

I think the difference is Plex offers a web address you can use for logging into Plex and for sharing it with others. So, you get a friendly admin interface with oauth for logging in from other popular services as the Plex user getting setup.