this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
691 readers
237 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So, putting the missiles in orbit instead of the submarine improves exactly what on that list of requirements?
The missiles will be significantly harder to hit than the submarine in a few years.
Are there missile defense systems? Yes, but taking down short range missiles is significantly easier than ICBMs or hypersonic missiles. It's like hitting a bullet with another bullet if you don't catch it early in the launch.
And you're forgetting that MIRV's are a thing. Missile defense systems have limited capacity and are expensive to field. Meanwhile you can use MIRV's to multiply the effective number of missiles you're launching for not much extra cost.
The missiles that pass over your head in a fixed time 16 times a day?
Way to completely misread what I said.
The missiles won't be harder to hit in the future. Submarines are going to be that much easier to hit.
Are you done being a dick now?
Take a look at what invention you are talking about.
Jfc you're dense. Just shut the fuck up