They are justifying not some hypothetical anarchist revolt against the state, but the actual historical destruction of the GDR, gutting it and sacrificing it to its Nazi neighbor. Elsewhere in the thread there's a link to the OOP and they are clearly talking about the part with the famous article about how queer rights will be undermined by "reunification", to which you can clearly see in the comment that they are basically saying it's understandable that people would abandon the queer population if it's expedient in their noble quest of destroying the "dystopia".

Edit: I can already hear their "I'm not touching yoooouuu" style defense of their statement, that they actually were talking about a hypothetical anarchist revolt and not supporting East Germany's actual destruction, but then why are they talking about abandoning queer people to start with? Surely their hypothetical revolt knows intersectionality is important, and it's not like there weren't anarchist types fighting for queer rights there as they do everywhere. The idea that this isn't expressing sympathy for the historical destruction of East Germany is not supported by the text and if db0 truly intended otherwise (bullshit), they should take a break from posting and take a remedial writing class to understand the concept of salience.