this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
57 points (96.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9258 readers
179 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that's a weird way to describe the castration thing

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a weird way to describe endorsing another candidate who wants to send weapons to genocide Muslims in a concentration camp

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

they let candidates who name it genocide and call for an end to military aid. it's the other things she's said that are too far, including old tropes.

she's better than the zionist cop, but i'm not over here trying to support a bunch of "jews control the media" types either.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

You don't have to support anything. You only have to acknowledge that in no way is anything she said worse than supporting the full scale genocide of Muslims. Do show where she said "Jews control the media". We've seen this exaggeration smear campaign against Corbyn already where people just replace or change whole quotes to make everything sounds antisemitic.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t think they’re after her for wanting to castrate pedophiles.

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 3 points 14 hours ago

i think they're civility-pilled because they're liberals and between that and the "jews own hollywood" type comments they all dropped their monocoles into their wine glasses

they are actually. Epstein candidates have been on a tear, getting millions in AIPAC funding and establishment backing. The pro-pedophile empire strikes back