this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
Socialism
4042 readers
18 users here now
Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.
Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You need The Poors in order to be able to exist. The mistake techbros seem to be making is thinking that they won't become The Poors in a society of immortal super-beings who only need electricity to continue their existence (a la The Matrix).
Which makes sense - both nations and corporations are immortal super-entities and they were able to bend them to suit their wishes, as they had tribes before either of them.
Although I am not certain if they are merely being greedy in the short-term, or implementing longer-term strategies looking ahead to when humanity may be significantly reduced by the effects of climate change. Perhaps they hope to be hailed as saviors of humanity's upcoming remnants. I try not to think about that too much though - it does not seem healthy.
Just want to point out corporations are systems of oppression. Nations are a mixed bag (I'm naive like that) that do contain systems of oppression as well. Hollow shells if not for the working class. They're leverage that makes it easier, not harder, to oppress the poor. If tech bros take pride in bending these entities to their will, they're failing to recognize they were on the same side all along. To be honest I don't give much credit to these guys' wisdom. Capitalism doesn't reward that. Sociopath workaholics with privilege and capital who never read their scifi until the end, the whole lot of them.
Yeah most of the men themselves seem to just be chasing some tiny semblance of human connection, like attempting to earn daddy's love. This seems to describe the likes of Musk and Zuckerberg.
Then Thiel seems on a whole other level, which might be best described as a semi- (or actual?) religious zeal.
Machiavellian principles act regardless of whether intentionally applied or not. I guess, they do what they found works for them, rather than hold back based on a sense of morality (or in the case of Thiel, having a contradictory morality).
To the detriment of us all, though they might be slightly happier themselves in the meantime, riding that wave of addictive destruction.