this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
73 points (92.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26601 readers
160 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The computer or spreadsheet idea is a bit ridiculous to me on account of even ancient humans could devise the same method in a smaller scale without the backbreaking 5,000 holes being dug. Every other idea presented by the article makes sense to me.

[–] teft@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ancient humans were kind of known for building things big af though. Pyramids, petroglyphs, henges.

Khufu’s pyramid has like 2 million blocks. 5000 holes is a rounding error.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Those were big because they had religious meaning.
That is very different from an accounting system, that is supposed to be practical.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless ancient humans were all Matt Parkers, it makes no sense to me that they'd make a gigantic counting system.

"Hey, we have 6 more livestock now"

"GATHER THE MEN, we're adding rocks to the hill!"

[–] teft@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

You're talking about a time that could be pre-numbering system so instead of "i have 6 sheep" it's more like "I have this many sheep" and you point to your hole which has 6 of whatever the thing is that they were using. maybe kernels of corn? Then you make sure you have one kernel for each sheep. But I'm just guessing.