this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
38 points (95.2% liked)
China, 中国
1175 readers
68 users here now
English
This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.
Rules:
- Be civil, be respectful, don't attack other users
- No racism, sinophobia, or other bigotry allowed
- No misinformation
- Follow all other Lemmy rules
中文
这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。
规则:
- 要文明,要尊重,不要攻击其他用户
- 不允许有种族主义、仇视中国人或其他偏执行为
- 不允许故意提供错误信息
- 遵守 Lemmy 的所有其他规则
Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛
Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Uh what you refer to as nominal possession is called a 70 year old residential lease of the land (one still owns the building on top), I'm not personally aware of many Chinese people who've owned a house for 70 years either but anyways there is debate on whether there should be fee on renewing the 70 year old lease or whether it should be automatically renewed but in either case property tax on inheritance isn't a bad thing.
Anyways yeah, the US is famous for always having respected personal property and not steamrolling entire neighborhoods of minorities to build roads and companies who further pollute the surroundings without moderation.
Plus, I'd much much rather prefer that all the houses in a country eventually go back to the state after use for redistribution, instead of to private corporations like Blackrock and Blackstone which can then turn housing into a speculation market to turn people who want shelter into cash cows, don't know about you but the former is increasingly sounding like the more democratic option.