this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

60320 readers
669 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hope it doesn't say as I didn't bother to check - how do free projects get money for audits like this?

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Good question. I don't see anything about current funding. They do mention in the road map having a premium cloud subscription to cover cloud hosting.

I'm a keepass user myself. Too many hosted programs turn to crap one way or another. Let alone the trust componet. I hope for the best with this software.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Excellent question, because financial transparency is becoming more and more of a factor in my shift to open software.

And I suspect that there are indeed a few not-so-good actors who are abusing FOSS for political or financial gain.