this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2628 readers
52 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
34
arXiv bans academic authors for AI slop papers (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 2 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

the hit AI dogs holler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJg1wHzR1gc&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260215-arxiv-bans-academic-authors-for-ai-slop-papers - podcast

time: 8 min 39 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aio@awful.systems 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not quite clear to me that

We rely on some standard LLM detectors to focus our attention on papers that need to be checked.

implies they are using LLMs themselves. The phrase "LLM detector" is a bit ambiguous and could mean "LLM being used as a detector" or just "classifier program designed to detect LLM output".

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know of any examples that aren't LLMs themselves.

[–] aio@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

Ah okay, I didn't realize that.