this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)
World News
2163 readers
827 users here now
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
These things really can destroy cases as a lot of stuff suddenly becomes inadmissible in court because it wasn't presented through proper channels and jurists may be requested to ignore it entirely. At least this is how it can work in the USA in a lot of cases.
Further, depending on the circumstances of how the initial connection to the pedophile in question was made, it can be potentially considered a type of entrapment, as it may be able to be argued that if this person did not present themselves as a willing child to begin with that the perpetrator may have never attempted to pursue such a crime.
The fact that they're backed by right wing politicians kind of says everything: They're way more concerned with looking like they're doing something about the social issue of pedophiles while actually not doing very much at all. There's also a suspiciously high number of people in these "catch a pedophile" groups who end up being convicted of some sort of pedophilia themselves, as though they're projecting their own disgust with themselves and/or they think people won't suspect them of it as long as they're busy busting others for it. The conservative right wing only cares about appearances, not real solutions, while allowing the Epstein class to continue trafficking, raping, and killing children.
I had no idea that this was a right-wing movement so I'm not defending them at all, but... even if the "bait" didn't go through "proper" channels, isn't the publicity crippling them socially good enough?
But... they could've still chosen to say "no"...
Definitely, but sadly it's his lawyers job to argue things like this to protect their client. It also means a jury has to buy it, which they probably won't if this is actually allowed to be used as evidence.
I would hope publicly crippling them would be enough, but I'd rather they get actual justice.