this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
216 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84643 readers
3705 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I find this move concerning, and wish that the Founder had looked for a new CEO that shared his values rather than a Private Equity and Mergers Expert.

Furthermore, the change to the GRIT motto is worrying. Trust is useless without Transparency when it comes to code and security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 22 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

hope this does not fuck up my vaultwarden hosting.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Narrator: ...but it did.

I'm amazed that vaultwarden has maintained such fantastic compatibility with bitwarden. ...but all it takes is one api with an obfuscated "signed request" to bring it all down.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

No?

I get that clients might break, but the web portal running inside vaultwarden isn't gonna suddenly stop working.

Vaultwarden itself is self-contained. An API change won't do anything to it.

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Then it creates the opportunity (need) for an open sourced client, if that ever happens, I'm confident the community will come together and make one using the currently known API calls.

[–] IPlead386@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The current (at least android) client for bitwarden is already open source (GPL 3).

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I wasn't certain what the bitwarden clients were licensed under.

...but if they're all GPL, then yeah - it'll just get forked. Just like terraform vs opentufu. Just like MySQL vs MariaDB - it's a tale as old as time (unfortunately).

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Vaultwarden has a backend encrypted db and web server, with it's own API. The bitwarden clients are currently opensource so there could be a fork for the browser extension, and desktop client. Unlike 1Password, there is a good opensource base.