this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
766 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

15772 readers
151 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

As much as I LOL'd and agree with the sentiment, this is almost entirely about politics, not infrastructure -- the only tenuous connection is that the political shithead happens to own a car company. As such, please try to resist the temptation to post more stuff like this here.


Edit to address some feedback:

Yes, !fuckcars is political, but that doesn't mean everything political is on-topic. If this had been about Musk interfering with CA high-speed rail, it would be unambiguously on-topic. If this had been about the harmful effects of those trucks on other road users, it would be unambiguously on-topic (although for the record, I dislike threads hating on any one particular type of car because they risk missing the point that all of them contribute to most of the problems).

But it was neither of those things. It was just pointing out the dishonesty of people who bought a particular product with a particular political connotation. The fact that the product happened to be a vehicle was irrelevant to the idea being conveyed. That makes it a good fit for somewhere like !politicalmemes or !enoughmuskspam, maybe, but not here.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Elon musk himself is responsible for so much car centric bullshit. he has his own tunnels, his own chargers, he does everything he can to stop any anti-car development, and he has the most dangerous cars out there. this is only one of them by the way, the one that has sharp hard metal corners that are meant to slice pedestrians in half, but his other cars spontaneously combust.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really think that you can't divorce the car-centric hell we are currently suffering in from the politics that made it happen.

"Fuck Cars" is 100% a political statement.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Guys can we please talk about how we better organize society without being so political?

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

It's a really odd position to take when politics are literally the only route through which public infrastructure and services pass.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Guys can we please talk about how we better do politics without being political?"

I hope your statement was satire. Otherwise I question your understanding of basic concepts.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It’s so hard to tell. I read it and thought “Good joke!” and upvoted right away. But I had the same reaction when r/TheDonald started, so my sensor is busted.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I don't know. People are writing and calling the government every day, protesting online to attempt to improve public transportation, yet in vain. Well guess who's in control. And it's not just public transportation, you know.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's also a shitty, unreliable, dangerous vehicle that allows them to be on the road because Elon is the richest dipshit on earth right now.

He's pushed past regulations and forced his shitty vehicles to be on roads all across the world, including Europe, which doesn't have the road infrastructure to handle things like the cybertruck. It's bypassing regulation after regulation to show up on the road as a massive eyesore.

The Cybertruck is the culmination of everything fuckcars is about imo.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago

and only 2 types of people bought these, in the west coast, there arnt many magats that bought it, but ignorant to politics asian people.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

IMO while the post shows a cybertruck and it is the culmination of this community, the post clearly focuses on how horrible elon musk is, which would be better suited somewhere else (even tho I vehemently agree with the sentiment)

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where in the EU is it legal to drive a Cybertruck? Not in Germany as far as I know

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

According to this article (in german) the entire front section of the car would have to be redesigned for the cybertruck to be legal in europe.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

I think they are grey imports in Eastern European countries. I’ve seen at least one on YouTube, but it was some shitheads channel I don’t follow or remember the name of.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I've seen it in Warsaw.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Elon Musk is not a "political shithead" he is a primary reason why we don't have better forms of transportation, and it's worth pointing it out every single time. Also, aren't virtually all of the infrastructure issues that exist that make cars such a prevalent force in our society almost entirely predicated on politics? Was Robert Moses not motivated by his own politics? But was it not his policies that essentially birthed the modern hostility to humans that urban areas have?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

he is the sole reason for trashing fast rail in california, long enough for trumps 1st term elaine chao to block funding which delayed things for like 5+years, and even now its being half-assed.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Politics is the way we make decisions that affect more than three people.

Anything that affects society is politics. Even choosing to not do something is politics.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the whole hyper loop scam [1] he invented was to kill high speed rail in California. Fuck him.

[1] just see it in Las Vegas all out is a tunnel for cars that you pray there's no accident because of fire starts you are stuck and can't escape.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Give me a break. This shithead intentionally sabotaged high speed rail in CA. Lots of other issues.

Fuck elon apologism. Fuck cars and fuck this car douche.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Infrastructure, famously divorced from politics

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

No silly, politics is when minorities.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean there was the whole hyperloop thing he pushed in an attempt to prevent high speed rail construction in california.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

he delayed long enough for trumps 1st term elain chao to block any further funding.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 2 days ago

Do your job. Temp ban people who post low effort posts, including all image posts.