this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
81 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
84662 readers
3761 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's too late for Nuclear the drawbacks just don't outweigh the benefits anymore, we should have gone nuclear 50 years ago, now it makes sense to go straight to renewables.
I'm not against nuclear but it just doesn't make sense to build new nuclear China doesn't have any of the excuses pro-nuclear blame (NIMBYs/OSHA/etc) yet they aren't investing in nuclear.
Well we need both. We can't power the world 100% off renewables because we don't inave a global power distribution network.
Why not?
We have batteries, geothermal, hydro & wind.
There are already countries that are 100% renewable, without a global grid.
Yeah that's my point. It's all very well Norway being able to produce vast amounts of electricity but how do you transfer that to Japan or Australia? You can't because there isn't a global power distribution network you can't take electricity from any arbitrary point on the planet and deliver it to any other arbitrary point on the planet and until we develop such an interconnected system we're going to have to need independent power generation systems some of which won't be renewable.
The technology is sound and the drawbacks are massively overblown by the fossil fuel lobby. But Old style monolithic nuclear doesn't make any economic sense in the modern world. The regulatory system in most western countries plus mechanical complexity doesn't allow for it to be built in any reasonable timeframe.
SMR's might make a decent dent in decentralized grid situations tbh. Otherwise it's going to be everyone holding out for fusion to magically get its ass into gear.
Or y'know using renewable, China built/claims to have built 430 GW of renewables in 2025, solar can be deployed nearly anywhere and unlike SMR doesn't produce nuclear waste that you somehow have to safely despose of from your remote off grid location