this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Pokémon TCG Pocket

312 readers
1 users here now

Kick back and open some packs!


Welcome to our corner of the Poké-verse. This is a community for sharing and discussing the Pokémon TCG Pocket mobile game. Whether you're a hardcore collector or a casual fan, thanks for checking us out!


What We Do Here


Physical TCG & Art

Sharing art and discussing the physical TCG is permitted. To keep things organized, please label these posts clearly so they aren't confused with the Pocket edition.


Useful Resources

Textless Game Art:
Pokéos

Deck Ideas:
Game8

Meta:
TopDex

Card Value:
pokemon.eleet.dev

More Resources:
Lemmy post


Other Pokémon Communities

If you are looking for more general Pokémon discussion, check out these spots:

!pokemon@sopuli.xyz
!pokemon@lemmy.ml

If you’d like your community added to this list, please message a mod.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I got a bit more serious this ranked season, tracking my matches as I play.

I don't usually do this. In previous seasons, there's always handful of top-tier decks, which means that you know what to expect when queuing up for a game in ranked mode.

This season is different. In the competitive scene, there are easily 20 meta-viable archetypes right now, each with a decent chance of winning tournaments. The deck with the highest meta share is Hydreigon at less than 8%, a far cry from its peak of ~17% in B2 / Fantastical Parade. All of them have winrates that hover around 50%, so there is clearly no one dominant deck.

So I thought to track my games and see if there are any trends, any way to counter the meta (spoiler: not really).


I started at the bottom of ultra ball 4, at 690 points. I'm currently sitting at 823 point having just entered master ball. It took me 36 matches for this climb, with a win rate of 55.6% (20 / 36).

I swap my deck every 3 games, which means that I cycled through 12 decks:

my decks

  1. zoroark
  2. altaria-greninja
  3. sceptile
  4. hydreigon
  5. sleep lucario
  6. lucario-hitmontop
  7. altaria-gourgeist
  8. oricorio-magnezone
  9. manetric-zeraora
  10. flygon-goomy
  11. suicune-baxcaliber
  12. blaziken

Here's the full data:

match data

no.,my deck,opp deck,outcome
1,zoroark,sceptile,W
2,zoroark,sleep altaria,L
3,zoroark,hydreigon,L
4,altaria greninja,sleep vaporeon,W
5,altaria greninja,poison sceptile,L
6,altaria greninja,vaporeon milotic,W
7,sceptile,altaria greninja,W
8,sceptile,blaziken,L
9,sceptile,oricorio magnezone,W
10,hydreigon,rampardos goomy,W
11,hydreigon,hydreigon,L
12,hydreigon,suicune baxcaliber,L
13,sleep lucario,altaria greninja,W
14,sleep lucario,hydreigon,L
15,sleep lucario,charizard,W
16,lucario hitmontop,(dc),W
17,lucario hitmontop,venusaur celebi,W
18,lucario hitmontop,lucario hitmonchan,L
19,altaria gourgeist,sleep lucario,W
20,altaria gourgeist,gardevoir,W
21,altaria gourgeist,poison hydreigon,W
22,oricorio magnezone,sceptile,L
23,oricorio magnezone,sleep lucario,L
24,oricorio magnezone,zoroark,L
25,manetric zeraora,blaziken,W
26,manetric zeraora,lucario hitmontop,L
27,manetric zeraora,oricorio magnezone,L
28,flygon goomy,blaziken,L
29,flygon goomy,leafeon,L
30,flygon goomy,lucario hitmontop,W
31,suicune baxcaliber,charizard,W
32,suicune baxcaliber,hydreigon,L
33,suicune baxcaliber,sceptile goomy,W
34,blaziken,sceptile,W
35,blaziken,lucario hitmontop,W
36,blaziken,blaziken,W

Note that the extremely small sample sizes mean that individual deck's win rate is meaningless here.


All in all, I played against 21 unique archetypes:

opponents' decks

  1. sceptile (x3)
  2. sleep altaria
  3. hydreigon (x4)
  4. sleep vaporeon
  5. poison sceptile
  6. vaporeon-milotic
  7. altaria-greninja (x2)
  8. blaziken (x4)
  9. oricorio-magnezone (x2)
  10. rampardos-goomy
  11. suicune-baxcaliber
  12. charizard (x2)
  13. venusaur-celebi
  14. lucario-hitmonchan
  15. sleep lucario (x2)
  16. gardevoir
  17. poison hydreigon
  18. zoroark
  19. lucario-hitmontop (x3)
  20. leafeon
  21. sceptile-goomy

The most repeats I faced off against were Hydreigon and Blaziken at 4 times each. Right below them would be Sceptile and Lucario-Hitmontop, tied at 3 encounters.

more aggregate stats on opponents' decks

Deck count by condensed archetype:

  1. Sceptile - 5
  2. Venusaur - 1
  3. Leafeon - 1
  4. Blaziken - 4
  5. Charizard - 2
  6. Suicune - 1
  7. Vaporeon - 2
  8. Magnezone - 2
  9. Altaria - 3
  10. Gardevoir: 1
  11. Lucario - 6
  12. Rampardos - 1
  13. Hydreigon - 5
  14. Zoroark - 1

Deck count by type:

  • Grass - 7
  • Fire - 6
  • Water - 3
  • Lightning - 2
  • Psychic - 4
  • Fighting - 7
  • Darkness - 6
  • Metal - 0
  • Dragon - 0
  • Colorless - 0

With such variety in my games, I believe this has to be the most diverse meta in Pocket. (I only joined towards the tail end of WoSS, but I heard that previous meta had been completely dominated with Darktina.)


Unfortunately, such diversity means that it is harder to counter opposing decks without making your deck weaker into all the other decks.

However, IMO it is still possible to make some micro adjustments. For me, the main one I made was to include one copy of Chingling in some of the decks that don't typically run Chingling e.g. Magnezone, Blaziken.

A sizable fraction of my opponents were running rare-candy stage-2 decks. Naturally, Chingling shuts those down. Another significant chunk ran variants of Lucario, which meant taking weakness damage from Chingling who is Psychic type.

Most importantly, it decreases your odds of a bad start when going first, something that some of these decks struggle with. For example, a typical Blaziken runs 2 Torchics and 2 Castforms, which means starting with Torchic half the time. Adding Chingling would mean having a bad start 40% of the time when going first.


In a nutshell, the ranked meta in Pocket have never been more diverse, which does make for less stale gameplay IMO. There are still some annoyances like Lucky Ice Pop and Sleep Scam, but I'd say it's a fair trade.

If there's one main downside to this diversity, it is that battling just got harder for the average collector / casual battlers. Gone are the days where you can pilot just that one top-tier deck while keeping only 2 or 3 key match-ups in mind.


But enough about the meta. What decks are you running?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ladel@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe I'll make the same kind of post when I do it... Nice idea with Chingling. It reduces the chance of leading with torchic and not being able to do anything. At the same time, I'm scared of being able to play only Chingling for the first two turns and getting knocked out immediately.

[–] Endmaker@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

scared of being able to play only Chingling

That is a legitimate concern. The good news is, the decks best equipped to handle Chingling, the sleep decks, don't seem all that common at the moment. Only 1/9 (4 out of 36) of the decks I've faced ran the Igglybuff-Darkrai combo. With some luck, you'd be able to avoid them.

for the first two turns

Unless you are bricking very hard, most decks have enough draw engine to retrieve the rest of your basic pokemons: 2x Oak, 2x Copycat and 2x Pokeball on top of the basics in your pile.

Worst case, there's always the "Concede" button 😅