this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
127 points (98.5% liked)
Flippanarchy
2479 readers
1296 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Despite the quote, Kropotkin actually criticizes "civilized" peoples in Mutual Aid compared to "uncivilized" peoples, often in tribal forms of society. He doesn't feitishize tribal societies either though, he tends to lean much more towards the village structure of society, which I agree on. I think an ideal anarchist society would function as a confederation of "villages" (note, I use that term loosely, I am not an anprim). There are PLENTY of historical examples of confederations across the world which have worked, long before the rise of the nation-state in the 1500s, which so "coincidently" forming alongside the advent of capitalism, individualism, and the beginning of European colonialism.
Anyways, I agree. I would describe myself as post-civ, as I think since the rise of the agricultural revolution, the socieities we look back on as entire civilizaitons have been controlled by a powerful, wealthy few, who use their monopoly on violence to enact their will. If that's what civilization is, then I'm not really here for it.