this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
96 points (94.4% liked)
PieFed Meta
4776 readers
30 users here now
Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.
Wiki
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Chats still have their value before getting to Codeberg.
Codeberg is nice to track the work.
They all have their use.
no one said to not use codeberg, i just said to deactivate issues there
unifying the place where people talk and report
some people prioritize the git forge for this and leave out the rest, but this basically says ''we don't want you'' to all non developers
Deactivitating issues there would hide visibility on the work being done and planned.
This is the 1.7 roadmap: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/projects/37608
It helps to see what is being worked on.
Everyone is welcome to discuss things on !piefed_dev@piefed.social , the Zulip or Matrix groups.
yes, but we would go back to having more sources of truth that are heavier on the devs, even because of the repetitions and scattering of the same topics
why do you take single part of my message and answer to them like they are not part of the whole message blaze :(
first i said that single source of truth etc and then i pointed out that the single source has not to be dev oriented, don't answer to my second point with the issue of the first point
that is not true, there are a lot of kanbans and ticketing software that can be used; to be fair, i should have said deactivating the possibility to open and comment except by mantainers
and in the system i proposed, you could still join and comment issues and features on piefed anyway (if you are not one of the piefed people)