PieFed Meta

4756 readers

2 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rimu@piefed.social

What worked at 100 users broke at 5,000 (join.piefed.social)

submitted 1 month ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Deactivitating issues there would hide visibility on the work being done and planned.

This is the 1.7 roadmap: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/projects/37608

It helps to see what is being worked on.

but this basically says ‘’we don’t want you’’ to all non developers

Everyone is welcome to discuss things on !piefed_dev@piefed.social , the Zulip or Matrix groups.

[–] ex_06@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Everyone is welcome to discuss things on !piefed_dev@piefed.social , the Zulip or Matrix groups.

yes, but we would go back to having more sources of truth that are heavier on the devs, even because of the repetitions and scattering of the same topics

why do you take single part of my message and answer to them like they are not part of the whole message blaze :(

first i said that single source of truth etc and then i pointed out that the single source has not to be dev oriented, don't answer to my second point with the issue of the first point

Deactivitating issues there would hide visibility on the work being done and planned

that is not true, there are a lot of kanbans and ticketing software that can be used; to be fair, i should have said deactivating the possibility to open and comment except by mantainers

and in the system i proposed, you could still join and comment issues and features on piefed anyway (if you are not one of the piefed people)