this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

858 readers
396 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
74
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by plinky@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
 

linky

apparently, aocia claimed american war of independence was against rich people

*found it https://nitter.net/MarcoFoster_/status/2053273753401143399

AOC: “America was founded in revolt of British aristocracy. The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time. It’s actually the most American thing in the world for us to be fighting for the working class. It’s actually patently un-American to transform our country into a place of kings and landed gentry”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was started as a working-class uprising in 1775, with riots in many cities. The Continental Congress was formed by the bourgeoisie to co-opt the revolutionary fervor.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Shays rebellion might be cast in that light, but independence war was kinda bougie/landed gentry from the jump, no?

Like land speculation was rampant for all the involved *(and there was a lot of fomenting involved)

  • but honestly never was very interested in american independence war, aside from half remembered revolutions podcast, so i might be very wrong
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

Leopold Trebitch is a good source on this, I caught one of his book tours.

As soon as the frontier "closed", the social pressures started to creep back in. It makes sense that after more than a century of colonial development, a population of free Africans, "later" immigrants in cities, and others that could not secure land came to constitute a minority underclass that had the ability to pull off minor revolts.