this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)

World News

3320 readers
146 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreatSquare@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Except American leadership never admits defeat. It takes the NEXT leader who replaces the original to actually reverse the stupid decisions made. In recent conflicts it has taken a number of iterations of leadership change before America has begrudgingly retreated and pulled their forces out, regardless of the costs. (See Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc etc)

The idea that Trump, of all people, will weigh the costs and rationally decide to make logical choices now is super optimistic to put it lightly.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Trump is just a cog in the machine. The war is costing too much, just the damaged datacenters could be enough to Bezos (one of the true rulers of the US) tug his wires.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

And let's not forget the FED cannot print dollars like crazy anymore, value is migrating to the yuan. So, the money left in the safe is being eyed out by our Tech Monarchs to feed their AI bubble.

[–] GreatSquare@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the Fed will print more dollars like crazy because they don't want to stop the economy train. The AI bubble will be bailed out like the banks were bailed out in 2008.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

However if fewer people were getting those fresh dollars then the inflation would be felt more by the domestic market than it was in the past. Can the US still export inflation?

[–] GreatSquare@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We will see the same shit as 2008: Those rich people getting the fresh dollars leads to asset prices going even higher. I think it's already happening a bit now. And the US rich don't invest in companies that employ a lot of people any more.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's a possible outcome

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)