this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
581 points (99.0% liked)

me_irl

7711 readers
3674 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 181 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Talk about your salaries, people! The only benefit of keeping it secret is to your employer who can pay you less and get away with it.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 55 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I think a lot about how one place I worked at, when people started talking salaries, Management said that was a fireable offense.

Personally I think everyone involved in saying that should have been barred from management roles for life.

But because most of the people working there were in their early 20s, with no power alone and no organization, they went along with it.

Some years later the company build a salary comparison tool on their website.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Lol, that was literally illegal. Although I don't know whether the NRLB has any bearing anymore.

But by making taking about salaries illegal. It was explicitly considered by the courts to be anti-labor practices. It was used to prevent employees from forming a union.

[–] Crescent@fedinsfw.app 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Over here it's not "illegal", they just fire you with a different reason if you even as much as mention what you earn to a coworker.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should sue. Even at will doesn't let you fire for illegal reasons and that's an illegal reason. Employment attorneys take cases on contingency and live for these sort of slam dunk, easy win cases.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You would still have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that your firing was due to the salary discussion and not something else.

It's like when a cop wants to pull you over: if they follow you long enough you'll make enough of a mistake for the pretense.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, this would be a civil suit, so it's just preponderance of the evidence. Not hard to meet that for a case like this.

[–] Crescent@fedinsfw.app 0 points 1 week ago

Last guy who tried this was accused of stealing and got into huge trouble despite there being no proof.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)