this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
24 points (90.0% liked)

Books

8017 readers
58 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dresden@discuss.online
dresden_do@lemmy.world
JaymesRS@literature.cafe
JaymesRS@lemmy.world
dresden@piefed.world
24
I didn't like animal farm that much (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 days ago by cinoreus@lemmy.world to c/books@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

My biggest complaint was how thin the allegory was. Like, Orwell didn't have to use animal farms at all, it read like a history lesson for most parts. I felt between chapter 3 to chapter 8 were mostly just boring and pigs Doing a power capture slowly. Did chapter 3 to 8 help create the impact of chapter 9 and 10? Absolutely. Could they have been done better? I think so, it didn't have to be read like a history lesson.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Many of the animals are just direct references to specific people though.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but most people will not realize that and it makes it easier to have certain discussions with them.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't follow. People not understanding the book makes it easier to have discussions about what, exactly? Why have the characters be direct allegories in the first place if missing the allegory makes it easier to discuss things?