this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
421 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

21420 readers
774 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Haha wow he really tried to throw some antisemitism in there too.

“I must say that I consider the phrase tax the rich — [..] to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs, and even the phrase ‘from the river to the sea,’” Roth said.

I think you get a good peek into the psyche of powerful people when they use inappropriate terms from marginalized communities as a shield against just actions or comments made against them. It implies they see those genuine complaints from minorities as something merely performative - a tool for sympathy, a shield from criticism. It reveals narcissism and a lack of empathy.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From the river to the sea is not antisemitic. In the Palestine before 1947 Jews, Christians and Muslims all lived side by side as neighbors, and none of them had spwcial rights or was threatened.

What that sentence does mean though, is that there would be no jewish apartheid ethnostate that is actively stealing land left and right, and starting wars with people they see as inferior.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I know, that's just the card he's trying to play (the same card Israel uses regularly, 'any support of Palestine = antisemitism', 'any criticism of Israel = antisemitism').

Appreciate your comment though.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago

Ah, I misunderstood your comment then, it's true that Israelis try to play that card (quite successfully so).

I'd recommend putting the fake "antisemitism" (because not all anti Zionism is antisemitic) in quotes, to make it more clear.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Israelis are not a marginalized community for the record despite their victim playing, but I take your point.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Is he implying that he believes "rich = Jewish"? Because if so, how anti-semitic of him.

I have no qualms with working-class Jews.

Likewise, I think all billionaire oligarchs need to be taxed at higher rates. (Currently they're taxed less than the working class; being compelled to pay your fair share isn't prejudicial!). Race/ethnicity/religion simply doesn't factor into it.