this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
95 points (98.0% liked)
Privacy
48525 readers
142 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
SomeOrdinaryGamers is a hypocrite, and pathetically dependent on the opinions of random people on the internet. Bro made a video talking about how you should delete your twitter account and then he makes a new one behind the scenes like a week later. He makes videos about how bad the switch 2 is, says to not buy the switch 2, then proceeds to buy the switch 2 and makes a fucking apology video for people on reddit calling him out lmao. Those same chuds got mad he made a video calling out some vtuber creep he used to make a podcast with, and he took the video down. Bro has zero backbone or integrity. Also, most importantly he fucked up an arch update and had no backups, then blamed it on Arch and made a video about swapping to mint. (no hate towards mint, mint is awesome.)
All of this paired with him, allegedly pretending to be an engineer for credibility, really doesn't contribute to him being a trustworthy character. Which doesn't necessarily mean none of his content can be of value to some, but I do believe viewer discretion is appropriate here.