this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
148 points (96.8% liked)

Just Post

1479 readers
409 users here now

Just post something πŸ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More (not so) fun facts:

54% of American adults read below a 6th grade level.

21% read below a 5th grade level, which is considered functionally illiterate.

High immigration numbers don't fully explain it either, as first gen immigrants only make up about 1/3 of those with low literacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 10 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

When they say "If you can read a New York Times article" do they literally mean just READ the words and understand them individually, or do they mean read and possess the ability to apply critical thinking skills to what you just read?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I think they must also mean comprehension.

I read a little about how they determine "levels" of reading ability, and while vocabulary is part of it, higher level reading also considers sentence complexity, the ability to identify concepts, make inferences, pick up on the theme or tone, consider the author's biases, etc.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh, thank's for looking that up! It makes me me feel... slightly better? Although it doesn't make me feel great that there are so many people out there with just enough reading skills to be dangerous (applying their own biases, etc).

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Or just enough to read an opinion piece, but not enough to consider conceptual flaws in the argument or the author's intent/biases.

The other end is concerning too. I sometimes get the sense that even well-intentioned "elites" in politics/journalism/media come up with solutions for stuff that would work in their bubble, but are a complete disaster when applied to the general public because the nuance is lost.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 7 hours ago

well-intentioned β€œelites” ... come up with solutions for stuff that would work in their bubble, but are a complete disaster when applied to the general public

"That's right, it goes in the square hole!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)