this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2093 readers
979 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So...they CAN sell the cars cheaper. The just didn't want to before because of some "quarterly report"?

But NOW the "quarterly report" says to lower the price.

We need a war on GREED...or quarterly reports.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't disagree, but Kia is already a cut-rate brand. I highly doubt they're going to accept a cut to profits, so this means they'll be cutting quality.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

so this means they’ll be cutting quality.

Exactly where do you get the idea that high priced cars are higher quality? Look at real world reliability rankings, there is actually an inverse correlation.

That means more expensive vehicles tend to be less reliable. See Land Rover.

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Jeep is selling cars that start at $100,000 and if you think those are quality cars, I have a wide variety of bridges I would like for you to look at and consider for future investments

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

I doubt this is true anymore but it used to be that BMW made half their profit from the 5 series despite the 3 series dramatically outselling it. The 5 series barely cost more to produce but sold for much more.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

It's what BIG corporations do.

Too big to fail just so happens to ALSO be too big to care.

Without competition, the customer is always the loser.