this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
298 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55855 readers
1919 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What's the alternative though? High speed rail would be nice, but since that won't happen, you'd just have all those people driving cars instead.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Why won't it happen? High speed rail is a mature proven technology

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Not in this country. It’s nearly impossible to get the land to make it possible. Then it’s the fact that large districts are far apart. The economics of rail are tough. You take a 4 hour flight, it becomes a 16 hour rail trip.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Because Big Oil doesn't profit from high speed trains, since those trains don't run on fossil fuels (at least not directly). And everyone knows Big Oil rules the US in truth. Every president is just more or less a puppet from them.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -1 points 18 hours ago

Because there's zero political will to do so, our nation is huge, and there's no land to build this rail on without lots of eminent domain seizures.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the alternative?

Names existing, tried and tested alternative that has been working well for 200 years

Naw, can't do that, it'd be hard.

(This is you)

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Id love to see a bullet train from LA to Tokyo

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Okay please point out all these high speed rail projects happening around the country. AFAIK there's only one in SoCal and its been delayed for years and several orders of magnitude over budget. You people act like its just a matter of snapping your fingers and we suddenly have a high speed rail network, walkable cities, and no need for cars or airplanes.

I'm not opposed to any of this but we're just as likely to get transporter technology to rid ourselves of cars. Don't get mad at me for bringing you guys back down to earth.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

I mean it's not like I think trains come from magic. The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now. If you never start, it will never exist.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

There’s one in Texas that seems to have high potential of actually happening.

https://www.texashsr.com/project/

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I know: Zeppelins.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

The alternative is simply not going on a jaunt to Greece. It's a luxury.