this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2082 readers
890 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/63568513

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 49 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Did he forget about that lawsuit he lost where his tariffs were determined to be illegal?

Who am I kidding? He doesn't give a shit.

[–] samsamsamsam@discuss.online 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Supreme Court ruling was against tariffs under IEEPA. He is still able to use industry specific tariffs under Trade Expansion Act, that's how tariffs on Canadian auto, lumber, steel, aluminum sectors continue dispute Supreme Court ruling

is it then not possible for him to circumvent the ruling entirely by simply taxing the industries that account for like 99% of the trade with a given country? like it probably wouldn't be possible to list all the industries but surely listing 10 most popular ones would essentially equate to a blanket tariff

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's effectively a bailout with extra steps

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The car manufacturers will charge the customer any tariffs and then when they sue to get there money back they will not only keep the price at the higher level butv will then get the tariff money back. Same thing the last lawsuit did.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Except it's ongoing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 11 hours ago

Gotcha. Sorry, I'm really tired.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

I heard he gives shits all the time. Everyone's saying it.