Selfhosted

60970 readers

654 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Remote Code Execution in Forgejo? (dustri.org)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a follow up by the author:

https://dustri.org/b/follow-up-to-carrot-disclosure-forgejo.html

Including this:

So I ended up sending and email to Forgejo security team, containing: an apology, a bit about my reasoning for proceeding with carrot disclosure, recommendations about what to harden/review, and a bunch of commented exploits/proof-of-concepts as attachment. We'll see how it goes.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

this shit stirrer ex-googler really does not understand the signals people are giving... apparently the community response is "hilarious", the moderators removing their toots at both instances are "overzealous" for acting upon multiple reports and giving a ~~proper~~ hilarious removal reason.

"everyone is dumb but me!" lol... (not a quote)

this person is really butthurt that people are telling them they have acted very irresponsibly.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 points 2 months ago

I think they know what they're doing, bit of a troll. Framed like this in the article:

Various entities, including some with security teams, revised their judgment about what Forgejo is and isn't, which was the main goal of the previous blogpost.