this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
681 points (92.2% liked)

Political Memes

11914 readers
1853 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So, actually that question though? Genocide used to be a really, really bad thing, and here you're making light of it. I feel like people have lost the plot a bit if they talk about an actual genocide like this. "Yeah, sure they committed a bit of genocide, but have you seen the other guy?" I feel like I'm losing my mind

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, genocide is bad. You know what's worse? MORE genocide. That's what we got from people not voting because of it.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you market yourself as being against fascism, maybe don't vehemently support a different fascist regime and shout down anyone who questions it.

The fact that people like you are spending your energy getting pissy with the voters and not the fucking Democratic party who refused to change their stance is fucking insane.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

surprise: I can hold two thoughts in my head at once

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thoughts, sure. You've chosen to spend your time attacking those who wanted change, not the ones who refused to not back the systemic murder of an entire people.

Priorities.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn't realize I'm a different person.

The two thoughts I hold are "on election day, it's self-gratifying not to vote for the outcome with the highest lows, raising the floor" and "before and after election day, do whatever you can to make the lives of politicians who fail miserable and support better candidates, up to and including civil unrest"

Not voting is categorically ineffective. There may be plenty of things more effective than voting, but not voting isn't one of them.

People love to present this scenario like it's a lever with three positions: candidate A, candidate B, or civil unrest. But it's not. It's one switch with two buttons (candidate a, candidate b) and another separate button for civil unrest. You can do both

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We have had years of constant video footage of it happening. Being desensitized is bound to happen.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know what kind of person could look at parents being handed the remains of their child in plastic baggies and at any point in their life go "oh wow are they still going on about the genocide?"

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That isn’t what they were saying tho.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No, no one is saying those words exactly. But I see the sentiment be expressed in threads like this over and over, and it just doesn't compute.