this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)

politics

29631 readers
1275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"progressive" platform

We still do not know if hes a truly reformed nazi or going to be the next Fetterman.

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Two points:

First, he was 'outed' by Maine Wire (a far-right news site; same story got picked up by the Daily Caller) as working with the Socialist Rifle Association some time after the pandemic to train people in gun safety and marksmanship. The SRA is very explicitly anti-fascist, and radically inclusive; they are pro-LGBTQ+, pro-feminism, etc. If he had genuine Nazi leanings, I highly doubt that he'd be helping the SRA in any way. That's not dispositive, but it's a pretty solid indicator that, at the very least he believes that 2A rights are for everyone, and not just people like him.

Second, you are correct that we don't know for sure that he is who he says he is. I know people through the Liberal Gun Club that knew him growing up, and say "he's the real deal", but that's not proof. On the other hand, we know exactly who Susan Collins is. We also know exactly who Janet Mills is. And Mills is a politics-as-usual Democrat. She's fine, really, she's very acceptable as a governor. She was Chuck Schumer's personal pick for the next Maine senator (which, IMO, should be a huge fucking red flag right there; no one in a contested primary that's endorsed by Schumer or Jeffries should be selected as a nominee). She simply is not up to the task of being a senator, not at this time in history. Biden was politics as usual, and the politics as usual is exactly what got us Trump 2.0.

So, is (was, now that Mills is out) Platner a gamble? Yes. But he's a gamble where the two choices that are known are both not acceptable.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I appreciate context on that first part, and Ive always believed his story on his tattoo, being a "it was a tattoo shop pick and i was military. It looked cool." I didnt know it was a nazi tattoo either.

On his race, may e i havent been clear but id pick this guy every time. I wish he didnt have his baggage but ill take what i can get

[–] Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Go listen to him on Jon Stewart’s podcast this week.

If he’s still a Notse then I will have to get “worlds biggest dope” tattooed to my body.