this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
50 points (98.1% liked)
CSCareerQuestions
2403 readers
4 users here now
A community to ask questions about the tech industry!
Rules/Guidelines
- Follow the programming.dev site rules
- Please only post questions here, not articles to avoid the discussion being about the article instead of the question
Related Communities
- !programming@programming.dev - a general programming community
- !no_stupid_questions@programming.dev - general question community
- !ask_experienced_devs@programming.dev - for questions targeted towards experienced developers
Credits
Icon base by Skoll under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Software dev with over 17 years experience here, who also uses AI a lot in his job.
People are pretty stupid
How the hell would AI be able to take over... without people with CS skills to... make the... AI?
Its literally like claiming that engineers jobs will be taken over by robots... Who is going to make and design the robots...?
AI isnt going to take over our jobs, AI is a tool we use to do our jobs better/faster.
Its akin to what happened with carriage drivers when the automobile was invented. Horses lost their jobs, for sure, but cab drivers now vastly outnumber how many horse carriages we used to have.
When the cost and time to do a job goes down, demand goes up exponentially because budgets follow a curve, down to a breaking point but a breaking point we arent anywhere remotely close to.
When you halve the cost of your product, you MORE than double your demand because as price goes down, the buyers who can afford you go up EXPONENTIALLY.
So don't worry about it, but you DO need to extremely critically be very aware of and be ready to learn how to use AI.
Also, a Comp Sci degree is a theoretical math degree focused on the theory of programming. Its not recommended for a practical path in life if you want to be actually making software.
Computer Sciences: Publishing papers on math theory with respect to AI, Encryption, Math, Game Theory, Set Theory, stuff like that
Computer Engineering: Designing and building hardware, and creating firmware for it. ESp32s and Arduinos go BRRRRRR. Get read to solder stuff.
Software Engineering: I wanna make programs that do stuff for people, but I demand a higher salary and in turn am eligible for more advanced work where peoples lives and safety might be at stake. However, I have to spend an extra 40 to 50 grand to get this title.
Software Developer: I wanna make programs too, but Im not gonna spend 40 grand on a fancy ring I can show off at parties and I cant call myself an "engineer" or I might get in trouble, but unless the stuff Im working on involves human lives/safety or mission critical things like bank software, no one gives a shit. You'll make less money but also have a waaay eaiser time finding work
Make sure you know which one you want and pick accordingly.
What happens to those people once the AI is finished?
Right, so one person can handle the workload of what 3 people (for example) used to do. Therefore AI just took those other two people's jobs.
Same thing that will happen whenever we finish the automobile.
Yet, manufacturers keep making new and various automobiles every single year so... hope you see where Im going with that.
Read the rest of my post before hitting the reply button, as I explicitly called this out and addressed it.
The common thread in all these doomer conspiracies is human adaptability. Slippery slope arguments assume that once a technology introduces a specific risk, society lacks the agency to create counter-measures, new norms, or alternative uses for that technology. Instead, history shows that when a "slope" appears, regulation steps in, technology evolves to solve the problem, or the culture shifts to reinterpret the tool.
In almost every case, the feared "bottom" of the slope was never reached because humans constantly built ramps or bridges along the way.
it's corporate fus to pay devs less
expect pay to be hurt because that’s the point
suppressing living wages is always the point