this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
115 points (98.3% liked)

Solarpunk

8902 readers
8 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (14 children)

Building a large bridge like that, with the added complication of holding lots of protentially water soaked heavy soil and trees roots that try to break through the bottom isn't cheap. More or less the same reason why roof-top parks are prohibitively expensive in most cases.

What I find a bit surprising is that they didn't go for a tunnel for the cars, which is typically cheaper to do.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Easier to build a bridge over a freeway that already exists than to divert the freeway into a tunnel, I guess. Tunnels also require solid bedrock for structural integrity, which for all I know, this region may not have. And there may be additional risks in California with the frequency of earthquakes. But I'm not an expert, just assuming that they already weighed options and had reasons to settle on this approach.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tunnels are a more costly than bridges, especially if you can't just cut and cover.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

That highly depends of the terrain and whats on top of it. Urban tunnels are much more expensive indeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)