this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
65 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11926 readers
510 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So the fat fuck gets caught, tried lying to justify it (see article) after a round of what about (paid less than Québec per unit - for a luxury plane vs air ambulances). Unworthy of reelection. Can we do anything to chastise him?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 24 points 1 week ago (7 children)

lol him saying they were going to use it to transport fire fighters for wild fires or flooding or to evacuate first nations people from up north when need be...no you corrupted drug dealing fuck you weren't going to use it for that. you were going to use it as your private little luxury jet because you didn't like flying in the OPP ones.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They can’t land a jet on those runways, so obviously they weren’t going to do this.

It would take 1000 flights on first class to make up the price of this jet. Realistically this is a stupid purchase unless the government of Ontario becomes a travel service.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

That's where you're wrong, because every flight ON the jet costs the same in fuel and aircrew as 50 first class tickets! So you literally can NEVER repay the costs it INCREASES with every flight!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)